Better Cities Project
  • Home
  • About Us
    Our Vision
    BCP’s vision is that free-market municipal policy solutions are broadly available, widely acceptable, and regularly employed, enabling American cities to achieve their full potential as engines of economic prosperity. We reject the idea that cities are lost to free-market principles or policies.
    Our Mission
    BCP uncovers ideas that work, promotes realistic solutions, and forges partnerships that help people in America’s largest cities live free and happy lives.
    Learn More
    • About Better Cities Project
    • Our Focus Areas
    • Our Team
    • Collaboration and Careers -- Work With BCP
  • Research and Projects
  • Latest Insights
  • Videos
  • Contact
    Our Vision

    Address

    304 S. Jones Blvd #2826
    Las Vegas NV 89107

    Phone

    ‪(702) 546-8736‬

    Hours

    Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

    Email

    info@better-cities.org

    Email Us

    No Result
    View All Result
    Better Cities Project
    • Home
    • About Us
      Our Vision
      BCP’s vision is that free-market municipal policy solutions are broadly available, widely acceptable, and regularly employed, enabling American cities to achieve their full potential as engines of economic prosperity. We reject the idea that cities are lost to free-market principles or policies.
      Our Mission
      BCP uncovers ideas that work, promotes realistic solutions, and forges partnerships that help people in America’s largest cities live free and happy lives.
      Learn More
      • About Better Cities Project
      • Our Focus Areas
      • Our Team
      • Collaboration and Careers -- Work With BCP
    • Research and Projects
    • Latest Insights
    • Videos
    • Contact
      Our Vision

      Address

      304 S. Jones Blvd #2826
      Las Vegas NV 89107

      Phone

      ‪(702) 546-8736‬

      Hours

      Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

      Email

      info@better-cities.org

      Email Us

      No Result
      View All Result
      Better Cities Project
      No Result
      View All Result
      Home Community, Growth and Housing

      COVID-19 exposed how bad policies cause affordable housing crises in cities

      Complicated regulations don't help families keep a roof over their heads

      Ethan Blevins headshotbyEthan W. Blevins
      June 24, 2020
      in Community, Growth and Housing
      Reading Time: 3 mins read
      A A
      apartment for rent sign
      Share on FacebookShare on TwitterLinkedInEmail

      As the COVID-19 outbreak ran through the U.S., many cities enacted rent-control and anti-eviction policies meant to keep people in their home who might be facing hardships because of the pandemic. These policies might sound noble to some, but they ignore the underlying causes of the affordable housing crises in cities across the country.

      Even before the challenges brought on by COVID-19, Renting or buying a home has become nearly impossible for low-income and middle-class families in many cities. Too many people blame developers or “gentrification” for affordable housing problems, while government policies—and many times, progressive government policies—are making most major cities across the country unaffordable.

      These policies are sold as ways to increase equal access to housing. But the regulations drive up costs in markets where the housing crunch has already reached a desperate crescendo. If these regulatory trends continue, even after the economy improves cities will struggle to rise from their housing woes.

      RelatedInsights

      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      Book Review: “Arbitrary Lines” by Nolan Gray

      Book Review: “The Municipal Financial Crisis” by Mark Moses

      Institute for Justice: Meridian Woman Fights City’s Ban on Living in Tiny Homes on Wheels

      The classic example of a counterproductive housing regulation is rent control. Yet more novel but equally misguided laws that will have similar inflationary effects are growing in popularity.

       

      “First-in-time” laws

      A “first-in-time” law requires landlords to rent to the first qualified applicant that walks in the door, and landlords cannot deviate from their written rental criteria. This idea began in Seattle, Washington, and a similar idea has spread to Portland, Oregon. The rule is designed to prevent landlords from subconsciously discriminating against rental applicants.

      But the rule actually hurts low-income renters in multiple ways.

      In cities with effective housing laws, landlords can exercise their discretion to rent to families that might not meet the rental criteria but need help. But first-in-time laws prevent landlords from helping people in need and forces them to rent to the first in line, whomever that may be.

      Also, people that are likely to be first in time are unlikely to be the type of renter who most needs help. People who can apply first will be those with language proficiency, transportation, internet access, and flexible work hours (i.e., not the neediest among us). In other words, the rule is often  another barrier to low-income households trying to find affordable housing.

       

      Background check bans

      Oakland, California; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Seattle and Portland have recently passed rules restricting or outright banning checks on criminal history, credit scores, and past evictions. Seattle’s may be the worst—it imposes a flat ban on inquiring about criminal history regardless of the gravity or age of the offense. Unfortunately, the Washington State Legislature has recently proposed a statewide version of the ban.

      As with the first-in-time idea, this exacerbates the housing crunch. Smaller landlords who typically offer lower rent than corporate landlords cannot afford complicated and onerous regulatory burdens. Blinding landlords to tenant applicants’ criminal background, credit history, or eviction history forces them to assume that any applicant could be a serious liability. In response, landlords are forced to either bow out of the housing market or increase rents and security deposits to underwrite risks to their property and neighboring tenants.

      Cities should not ignore the problem of housing discrimination and the negative effects of criminal history. But the solutions to discrimination also should not gut the low-rent housing stock.

      Cities should not ignore the problem of housing discrimination and the negative effects of criminal history. But the solutions to discrimination also should not gut the low-rent housing stock. When it comes to criminal background, for instance, plenty of other options present themselves. Lawmakers could emulate the Department of Housing and Urban Development by developing a certification program that allows formerly incarcerated individuals to demonstrate good character. Cities could also consider offering public insurance to cover the risks a landlord accepts when renting to individuals with a criminal history.

      Housing crises getting worse

      A recent op-ed in The Seattle Times written by a pair of Seattle landlords speaking out against a new ban on winter evictions put the problem well: “Our ability and the ability of other small landlords to offer ‘naturally affordable’ housing (rentals that are less expensive than newer housing or larger corporate rentals) is dwindling very quickly. This legislation and other recent ordinances…have significantly increased the risk, liability and complexity of being a small private housing provider in Seattle.” The result is not hard to predict: higher rent, stricter rental criteria, and fewer rentals.

      While problems like discrimination may persist in housing markets, there are ways to combat discrimination without hurting the people potentially being discriminated against. Cities’ highest priority should be ensuring that people can afford housing in the first place. COVID-19 or not, saddling landlords with a heap of complicated regulatory burdens will not help struggling families get — or keep — a roof over their heads.

      Tags: Background ChecksCOVID-19RegulationRent ControlRental Housing
      Previous Post

      When the moratorium expires: 3 quick steps to reduce eviction

      Next Post

      Getting cities back to work

      Ethan W. Blevins

      Ethan W. Blevins

      Ethan Blevins is an attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation and works in Salt Lake City, Utah. He received his JD and an LLM in international and comparative law. He then clerked for Justice Don Willett of the Supreme Court of Texas. Inspired by Justice Willett’s staunch belief in individual rights, Ethan decided to devote his legal career to freedom.

      Explore More

      • Economic Prosperity
      • Criminal Justice and Public Safety
      • Transportation and Infrastructure
      • Education
      • Energy and Environment
      • Community, Growth and Housing
      • Clean, Open and Fair Government

      Recent News

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      December 22, 2022
      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      December 22, 2022
      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      October 6, 2022
      Book Review: “Arbitrary Lines” by Nolan Gray

      Book Review: “Arbitrary Lines” by Nolan Gray

      October 5, 2022
      Load More
      Facebook Twitter RSS
      Better Cities Project

      Better Cities Project helps people in America’s largest cities live free, happy lives. We uncover what works, promote solutions, and forge partnerships that turn ideas into results.



      © 2021 Better Cities Project

      Our Focus Areas

      • Economic Prosperity
      • Criminal Justice and Public Safety
      • Transportation and Infrastructure
      • Education
      • Energy and Environment
      • Community, Growth and Housing
      • Clean, Open and Fair Government

      The Fine Print

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Reports and Financials

      Recent News

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      December 22, 2022
      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      December 22, 2022
      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      October 6, 2022
      No Result
      View All Result
      • Home
      • About Us
      • The Team
      • Work With Better Cities Project
      • Research and Projects
      • Latest Insights
      • Videos

      © 2022 Better Cities Project

      Welcome Back!

      Login to your account below

      Forgotten Password?

      Retrieve your password

      Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

      Log In

      Add New Playlist

      Love Cities? So Do We.

      Get ahead of the curve -- learn about innovations, ideas and policies driving change in America's largest cities, with BCP in your inbox.



      You have Successfully Subscribed!