Better Cities Project
  • Home
  • About Us
    Our Vision
    BCP’s vision is that free-market municipal policy solutions are broadly available, widely acceptable, and regularly employed, enabling American cities to achieve their full potential as engines of economic prosperity. We reject the idea that cities are lost to free-market principles or policies.
    Our Mission
    BCP uncovers ideas that work, promotes realistic solutions, and forges partnerships that help people in America’s largest cities live free and happy lives.
    Learn More
    • About Better Cities Project
    • Our Focus Areas
    • Our Team
    • Collaboration and Careers -- Work With BCP
  • Research and Projects
  • Latest Insights
  • Videos
  • Contact
    Our Vision

    Address

    304 S. Jones Blvd #2826
    Las Vegas NV 89107

    Phone

    ‪(702) 546-8736‬

    Hours

    Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

    Email

    info@better-cities.org

    Email Us

    No Result
    View All Result
    Better Cities Project
    • Home
    • About Us
      Our Vision
      BCP’s vision is that free-market municipal policy solutions are broadly available, widely acceptable, and regularly employed, enabling American cities to achieve their full potential as engines of economic prosperity. We reject the idea that cities are lost to free-market principles or policies.
      Our Mission
      BCP uncovers ideas that work, promotes realistic solutions, and forges partnerships that help people in America’s largest cities live free and happy lives.
      Learn More
      • About Better Cities Project
      • Our Focus Areas
      • Our Team
      • Collaboration and Careers -- Work With BCP
    • Research and Projects
    • Latest Insights
    • Videos
    • Contact
      Our Vision

      Address

      304 S. Jones Blvd #2826
      Las Vegas NV 89107

      Phone

      ‪(702) 546-8736‬

      Hours

      Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

      Email

      info@better-cities.org

      Email Us

      No Result
      View All Result
      Better Cities Project
      No Result
      View All Result
      Home Economic Prosperity

      Local governments should embrace change ahead of likely fiscal woes

      Cities of all sizes need to consider not just how to get through the near-term health crisis, but also how to prepare for longer-term financial challenges

      byJoe Coletti
      April 28, 2020
      in Economic Prosperity
      Reading Time: 4 mins read
      A A
      Local governments should embrace change ahead of likely fiscal woes
      Share on FacebookShare on TwitterLinkedInEmail

      Local governments have been the first line of public action in the fight against the new coronavirus and COVID-19. They are also the level of government most vulnerable to the fiscal impact of the virus and response.

      Smaller towns and counties were already dipping into fund balances for pre-pandemic operations. Now, local governments of all sizes need to consider not just how to get through the near-term health crisis, but also how to prepare for longer-term financial challenges.

      Revenues will fall…

      Sales taxes are not as volatile as income taxes, but still fluctuate with economy, and provide a significant portion of local-government income. Closed restaurants and canceled events mean entertainment and tourism taxes also take a big hit. New York City could lose up to $6 billion in tax revenue as a result of the coronavirus shutdown. Other entertainment and convention centers will lose large portions of their budgeted revenue.

      RelatedInsights

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      Book Review: “Arbitrary Lines” by Nolan Gray

      Book Review: “The Municipal Financial Crisis” by Mark Moses

      The risks span nearly every aspect of municipal revenue. College towns have seen population declines six weeks earlier than normal, and every town will lose graduations, proms, and countless other celebrations. Landlords and banks can offer grace for rent and mortgage payments, but that could leave them without enough to cover property tax bills when they come due. Development and impact fees will dry up with fewer new construction plans.

      Enterprise funds will also suffer. These cover activities that local governments hope will pay for themselves, such as golf courses, convention centers, hospitals, and utilities. Many municipalities that operate utilities will face a backlog of unpaid receivables since most have generally refrained from cutting off utilities and reconnected utilities disconnected because of missed payments. Convention centers will be empty into June at the earliest, which will also affect the surrounding business districts. Public transit ridership is down, which also means lower revenues. As public hospitals prepare for and treat COVID-19 patients, their charges for other services will also take a hit.

      If everyone is lucky, the revenue hit will be temporary.

      … And most expenditures will not

      Even as tax, fee, and service revenues fall, local governments still must maintain trash pickup, police, and other services. There will be some savings on facility costs and fuel, but nothing close to the lost revenues.

      As if that weren’t enough, demand for social services will increase, meaning higher cost for housing, food, mental health, and Medicaid in states where local governments share in cost. Cratering financial markets will demand higher payments over the next five years to maintain pension solvency. Health coverage for local employees will also likely become more expensive.

      How to respond

      States don’t have the capacity for broad help, and are more likely to either push more costs down or end assistance they’ve been providing in the past.

      States don’t have the capacity for broad help, and are more likely to either push more costs down or end assistance they’ve been providing in the past. For cities to recover, changes in policy that reduce both state and local burdens should occur simultaneously:

      • A first step: Reconsider the economic incentives that throw money at large companies to move in instead of allowing local companies to grow. These usually involve both state and local funds. States that have not yet imposed a moratorium on incentives for intrastate moves could easily do this.
      • Local capital projects funded by the state still often require local expenditures to maintain. A pause would provide leeway for both the state and local government. This may also a good time to get out of the business of convention centers, sports facilities, and performing arts centers.
      • Governments, like the businesses in their communities, are learning to work remotely. They should consider shrinking the space they use and what facilities they can sell. Other businesses may be making these same calculations, which could further impinge on property tax collections. Maintaining water and road infrastructure is already a burden, which may lead to more interconnection of local utilities.
      • States should encourage municipalities to look for ways to improve quality and reduce cost of back office (finance, IT, HR) by sharing services. Local governments could share a common resource with others in their area or smaller governments could outsource their services to a larger city or county across the state. Few local governments can afford to hire and keep a person with the experience needed for the complexity of protecting even a small town’s IT system or keeping up with GASB financial requirements.
      • Cities and states can adjust zoning and permitting to allow more home-based businesses to form and thrive. An Arizona bill would allow “no-impact” home-based businesses anywhere in the state. Now that people have worked at home, more may want to stay home and start a business. They may also consider relaxing rules on food trucks, which are only open for take-out, and other services.
      • In times of fiscal stress, there’s a role for additional oversight. States should also consider creating a Local Government Commission like North Carolina did in 1931 after a spate of municipal bankruptcies. The LGC monitors the fiscal health of local governments, approves proposed borrowing, and provides management assistance.

      COVID-19 leaves local governments stuck trying to balance budgets without much flexibility in cutting the services they provide. Cities cannot simply raise taxes on their residents and cannot rely on financial assistance from the state.

      Change can be difficult at the best of times. But for many cities, the change may be a matter of fiscal survival. Developing a plan around sound, proven policies that have worked in other communities shouldn’t wait for the lockdown to end. The time to act is now.

      Via: American Enterprise Institute
      Tags: BudgetsCOVID-19Fiscal PolicyRegulation
      Previous Post

      Podcast: When will your city feel the fiscal impact of COVID-19?

      Next Post

      Are continued coronavirus shutdowns constitutional?

      Joe Coletti

      Joe Coletti

      Joe Coletti is a senior fellow at the John Locke Foundation in Raleigh, North Carolina. He examines fiscal and tax policy, and previously headed the North Carolina Government Efficiency and Reform initiative within the Office of State Budget and Management, which led to changes in automotive fleet management, natural and cultural resources, and state contracting.

      Explore More

      • Economic Prosperity
      • Criminal Justice and Public Safety
      • Transportation and Infrastructure
      • Education
      • Energy and Environment
      • Community, Growth and Housing
      • Clean, Open and Fair Government

      Recent News

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      December 22, 2022
      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      December 22, 2022
      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      October 6, 2022
      Book Review: “Arbitrary Lines” by Nolan Gray

      Book Review: “Arbitrary Lines” by Nolan Gray

      October 5, 2022
      Load More
      Facebook Twitter RSS
      Better Cities Project

      Better Cities Project helps people in America’s largest cities live free, happy lives. We uncover what works, promote solutions, and forge partnerships that turn ideas into results.



      © 2021 Better Cities Project

      Our Focus Areas

      • Economic Prosperity
      • Criminal Justice and Public Safety
      • Transportation and Infrastructure
      • Education
      • Energy and Environment
      • Community, Growth and Housing
      • Clean, Open and Fair Government

      The Fine Print

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Reports and Financials

      Recent News

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      December 22, 2022
      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      December 22, 2022
      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      October 6, 2022
      No Result
      View All Result
      • Home
      • About Us
      • The Team
      • Work With Better Cities Project
      • Research and Projects
      • Latest Insights
      • Videos

      © 2022 Better Cities Project

      Welcome Back!

      Login to your account below

      Forgotten Password?

      Retrieve your password

      Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

      Log In

      Add New Playlist

      Love Cities? So Do We.

      Get ahead of the curve -- learn about innovations, ideas and policies driving change in America's largest cities, with BCP in your inbox.



      You have Successfully Subscribed!