Better Cities Project
  • Home
  • About Us
    Our Vision
    BCP’s vision is that free-market municipal policy solutions are broadly available, widely acceptable, and regularly employed, enabling American cities to achieve their full potential as engines of economic prosperity. We reject the idea that cities are lost to free-market principles or policies.
    Our Mission
    BCP uncovers ideas that work, promotes realistic solutions, and forges partnerships that help people in America’s largest cities live free and happy lives.
    Learn More
    • About Better Cities Project
    • Our Focus Areas
    • Our Team
    • Collaboration and Careers -- Work With BCP
  • Research and Projects
  • Latest Insights
  • Videos
  • Contact
    Our Vision

    Address

    304 S. Jones Blvd #2826
    Las Vegas NV 89107

    Phone

    ‪(702) 546-8736‬

    Hours

    Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

    Email

    info@better-cities.org

    Email Us

    No Result
    View All Result
    Better Cities Project
    • Home
    • About Us
      Our Vision
      BCP’s vision is that free-market municipal policy solutions are broadly available, widely acceptable, and regularly employed, enabling American cities to achieve their full potential as engines of economic prosperity. We reject the idea that cities are lost to free-market principles or policies.
      Our Mission
      BCP uncovers ideas that work, promotes realistic solutions, and forges partnerships that help people in America’s largest cities live free and happy lives.
      Learn More
      • About Better Cities Project
      • Our Focus Areas
      • Our Team
      • Collaboration and Careers -- Work With BCP
    • Research and Projects
    • Latest Insights
    • Videos
    • Contact
      Our Vision

      Address

      304 S. Jones Blvd #2826
      Las Vegas NV 89107

      Phone

      ‪(702) 546-8736‬

      Hours

      Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

      Email

      info@better-cities.org

      Email Us

      No Result
      View All Result
      Better Cities Project
      No Result
      View All Result
      Home Transportation and Infrastructure

      A closer look at Kansas City’s fare-free transit proposal

      The idea seems to have been advanced with little analysis or regard for similar, failed efforts in the past.

      Patrick TuoheybyPatrick Tuohey
      February 17, 2020
      in Transportation and Infrastructure
      Reading Time: 4 mins read
      A A
      Kansas City streetcar

      A proposal to explore fare-free transit in Kansas City has been introduced without looking at the history of similar efforts around the country, according to the author. Photo courtesy of Wikipedia.

      Share on FacebookShare on TwitterLinkedInEmail

      Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) told a progressive audience at Howard University on February 7 that, “Public transit should be free.” This is just the latest call for free transit; the issue has been bubbling up around the country in the past few months, started in large part by some misreporting of events in Kansas City, Missouri.

      In December, city leaders instructed the city manager to work with transit officials on a policy that would “include a funding request in the next fiscal year budget to make fixed route public transportation fare free within the City.” The city’s next fiscal year does not begin until May 1, ad the just-released budget proposal does not include enough money for fare-free buses.

      That was picked up around the country and misreported as a done deal. Vox seems to have been first, reporting that Kansas City, “will be the first major US city to offer free bus service to residents by 2020.” Citing Vox, The New York Times reported that Kansas City, “declared that their buses would become fare-free this year.” A Worcester, Massachusetts magazine took it one step further and reported the matter in the past tense, claiming that, “Kansas City, Missouri, got rid of bus fares earlier this month.” Not to be outdone, NBC Boston aired a report that seemed to claim that Kansas City’s buses have been free for two years.

      RelatedInsights

      American Enterprise Institute: Report on walkable oriented districts

      History shows spending on infrastructure doesn’t always end well

      As urban life resumes, can US cities avert gridlock?

      New York yellow cabdrivers face growing uncertainty about industry’s future

      Like cities around the country, Kansas City is wrestling with how to pay for fare-free buses, with cost estimates ranging from $8 to $12 million annually. No one is sure because the city hasn’t analyzed the implications of going fare-free. The area transit authority, KCATA, has offered free bus passes to veterans and students in the recent past, and claims that over the past few years 23 percent of riders have paid no fare.

      Underscoring the uncertainty, in an interview with a local newspaper, KCATA CEO Robert “Robbie” Makinen flippantly offered, “Just because nobody else is doing it, that’s not a reason for us not to do it. What’s wrong with trying it? What’s the worst thing that happens? It doesn’t work, and Robbie gets fired.”

      Fare free buses are not without risk. Other cities have tried it—and abandoned it.

      A 2002 study authored by Jennifer Perone and Joel Volinski of the Center for Urban Transportation Research concluded:

      Based upon the findings of this synthesis, it is concluded that a fare-free policy might be appropriate for smaller transit systems in certain communities, but is ill-advised for larger transit systems in major urban areas because experience shows that in larger systems, a tremendous amount of criminal activity, as well as a sharp increase in ridership, caused higher maintenance costs, labor costs, and operational costs and drove away existing riders.

      In a 2012 book, “Implementation and Outcomes of Fare-Free Transit Systems,” Volinski details a fare-free pilot program in Austin, Texas. Ridership increased by as much as 70 percent, but there were issues of, “overcrowded buses, disruptive passengers, and unhappy bus operators.” The program was discontinued. Denver tried a similar fare-free program but saw the same results and discontinued it.

      Transit passengers say lower fares are not a priority. A 2019 survey of 1,700 riders around the country conducted by TransitCenter found, “What we heard is that most low-income bus riders rate lowering fares as less important than improving the quality of the service.”

      Unfortunately, a “draft mini-report” on fare free buses by the University of Missouri-Kansas City only made matters worse; making bold predictions by omitting any measure the costs of such a policy. Local leaders often fall prey to so-called economic impact analyses of municipal policy, claiming that spending public funds on transit will drive jobs and private investment. Those studies often fail to not only consider spending offsets, but claim as an impact investments that would likely have happened anyway or happened for other reasons entirely. The realities of municipal transit is that it often increases congestion and requires more energy, not less.

      One other impact not often considered is that going fare free may hinder a transit agency from improving the quality of service, not just by stripping them of funds, but by stripping them of information. Dr. Byron Schlomach at Oklahoma State University points out that, “Pricing plays an important role even in 90 percent subsidized, publicly-owned enterprises like bus transit. It can provide information for where and when the service is most highly valued and serve as an indicator for where resources should be allocated.”

      How would any transit agency collect information on the popularity of routes if not through the farebox? Perhaps it could install people-counting sensors on every bus entrance, but that’s an additional expense not often considered in this debate.

      Rep. Pressley and local leaders around the country seems to be jumping into this before it has given the issue any serious consideration. And while city leaders may mean well, public policy requires more than good intentions. Our national experience with large scale fare-free transit is not promising and what we know about the specific plans to offer fare-free bus service do not instill confidence.

      National and local leaders owe taxpayers and passengers more consideration of the benefits and costs of such policies before calling for such dramatic changes.

      Tags: KansasKansas CityMissouriTransit
      Previous Post

      Biden’s city-based visa program: An idea worth a deeper look

      Next Post

      As gig-economy platforms proliferate, cities struggle to keep up

      Patrick Tuohey

      Patrick Tuohey

      Patrick Tuohey is co-founder and policy director of the Better Cities Project. He works with taxpayers, media, and policymakers to foster understanding of the consequences — sometimes unintended — of policies regarding economic development, taxation, education, and transportation. He also serves as a senior fellow of municipal policy at the Show-Me Institute, free-market public policy think tank focused on Missouri.

      Explore More

      • Economic Prosperity
      • Criminal Justice and Public Safety
      • Transportation and Infrastructure
      • Education
      • Energy and Environment
      • Community, Growth and Housing
      • Clean, Open and Fair Government

      Recent News

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      December 22, 2022
      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      December 22, 2022
      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      October 6, 2022
      Book Review: “Arbitrary Lines” by Nolan Gray

      Book Review: “Arbitrary Lines” by Nolan Gray

      October 5, 2022
      Load More
      Facebook Twitter RSS
      Better Cities Project

      Better Cities Project helps people in America’s largest cities live free, happy lives. We uncover what works, promote solutions, and forge partnerships that turn ideas into results.



      © 2021 Better Cities Project

      Our Focus Areas

      • Economic Prosperity
      • Criminal Justice and Public Safety
      • Transportation and Infrastructure
      • Education
      • Energy and Environment
      • Community, Growth and Housing
      • Clean, Open and Fair Government

      The Fine Print

      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Reports and Financials

      Recent News

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      Lawsuit: Jacksonville, FL

      December 22, 2022
      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      Will California Pass Bill Easing Zoning Laws for Church-sponsored Housing Projects?

      December 22, 2022
      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      Lawsuit: Humboldt County, California

      October 6, 2022
      No Result
      View All Result
      • Home
      • About Us
      • The Team
      • Work With Better Cities Project
      • Research and Projects
      • Latest Insights
      • Videos

      © 2022 Better Cities Project

      Welcome Back!

      Login to your account below

      Forgotten Password?

      Retrieve your password

      Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

      Log In

      Add New Playlist

      Love Cities? So Do We.

      Get ahead of the curve -- learn about innovations, ideas and policies driving change in America's largest cities, with BCP in your inbox.



      You have Successfully Subscribed!