Better Cities Project
  • Home
  • About Us
    Our Vision
    BCP’s vision is that free-market municipal policy solutions are broadly available, widely acceptable, and regularly employed, enabling American cities to achieve their full potential as engines of economic prosperity. We reject the idea that cities are lost to free-market principles or policies.
    Our Mission
    BCP uncovers ideas that work, promotes realistic solutions, and forges partnerships that help people in America’s largest cities live free and happy lives.
    Learn More
    • About Better Cities Project
    • Our Focus Areas
    • Our Team
    • Collaboration and Careers -- Work With BCP
  • Research and Projects
  • Latest Insights
  • Videos
  • Contact

    Address

    304 S. Jones Blvd #2826
    Las Vegas NV 89107

    Phone

    (702) 608-2046‬

    Hours

    Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

    Email

    info@better-cities.org

No Result
View All Result
Better Cities Project
  • Home
  • About Us
    Our Vision
    BCP’s vision is that free-market municipal policy solutions are broadly available, widely acceptable, and regularly employed, enabling American cities to achieve their full potential as engines of economic prosperity. We reject the idea that cities are lost to free-market principles or policies.
    Our Mission
    BCP uncovers ideas that work, promotes realistic solutions, and forges partnerships that help people in America’s largest cities live free and happy lives.
    Learn More
    • About Better Cities Project
    • Our Focus Areas
    • Our Team
    • Collaboration and Careers -- Work With BCP
  • Research and Projects
  • Latest Insights
  • Videos
  • Contact

    Address

    304 S. Jones Blvd #2826
    Las Vegas NV 89107

    Phone

    (702) 608-2046‬

    Hours

    Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. - 5 p.m.

    Email

    info@better-cities.org

No Result
View All Result
Better Cities Project
No Result
View All Result
Home Community, Growth and Housing

Inclusionary housing: At what price?

Why even well-meaning inclusionary housing policies can cost millions per unit—and why that matters for housing policy everywhere.

Patrick TuoheybyPatrick Tuohey
May 5, 2025
in Community, Growth and Housing
Reading Time: 2 mins read
A A
Inclusionary housing: At what price?
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterLinkedInEmail
Inclusionary housing sounds like the kind of thing everyone should support—encouraging or requiring developers to include below-market units in new buildings so that low-income families can live in higher-opportunity neighborhoods. But as economist Evan Soltas shows in The Price of Inclusion, the cost of that idealism can be staggering. And while policymakers may be well-intentioned, taxpayers and prospective homebuyers are too often left footing the bill for a form of social engineering that fails basic cost-benefit analysis.

Soltas brings clarity to a debate long defined by slogans and wishful thinking. Using a rigorous methodology, he estimates the average cost of producing a single inclusionary unit in New York City is $1.6 million. For that price, governments could fund several housing vouchers, build multiple units in other neighborhoods, or invest in services that reach many more people.

Soltas acknowledges that children who grow up in higher-income neighborhoods tend to have better life outcomes. But he also makes clear that the tradeoff between cost and quality is far steeper than advocates often admit. When public dollars are used to nudge developers toward integration, the price tag can explode—especially in high-rent areas.

RelatedInsights

I study local government and Hurricane Helene forced me from my home − here’s how rural towns and counties in North Carolina and beyond cooperate to rebuild

Texas HB 24: A win for housing development—and a lesson for other cities

Streamlining permits to solve housing shortages

BCP’s Patrick Tuohey on The Messy City Podcast

The issue isn’t developer greed. Soltas finds that variation in marginal costs isn’t driven primarily by developers capturing windfalls. Instead, geography does the heavy lifting. The same policy can deliver inclusionary units for under $150,000 in one neighborhood and require ten times that amount in another. That’s because the opportunity cost of discounting a unit rises with market rents. The more expensive the location, the larger the subsidy required to make a deal pencil out.

Soltas’s most provocative finding is that, after adjusting for neighborhood differences, inclusionary housing doesn’t appear much more expensive than other housing programs. It only seems costly because it deliberately locates affordable units in high-cost areas—something vouchers and tax credits typically don’t do. That reframes the debate: inclusionary housing isn’t inefficient per se, but it is a costly way to achieve socio-spatial integration. The real question is whether it’s worth paying a six- or seven-fold premium per unit to place low-income households in affluent ZIP codes.

Policymakers should wrestle with that tradeoff openly. Soltas attempts to quantify it with a “marginal value of public funds” analysis, weighing fiscal cost against long-term gains for children raised in better neighborhoods. He finds a few places where the math works—“opportunity bargains” where the outcomes justify the spending. But in many high-cost areas, the benefits simply don’t measure up.

The lesson is broader than one city or one policy. Whenever government imposes complex mandates or layers subsidies onto constrained markets, it risks distorting supply, misallocating resources, and driving up costs. The goal of integration is admirable—but achieving it through development incentives alone is like trying to balance a budget with a hole in the bottom of the ledger.

At some point, policymakers must choose: do they want more affordable units or better-located ones? Inclusionary housing programs that try to do both often end up doing neither well—and at great expense.

Tags: HousingHousing AffordabilityPolicyResearchZoning
Previous Post

Streamlining permits to solve housing shortages

Next Post

Texas HB 24: A win for housing development—and a lesson for other cities

Patrick Tuohey

Patrick Tuohey

Patrick Tuohey is co-founder and policy director of the Better Cities Project. He works with taxpayers, media, and policymakers to foster understanding of the consequences — sometimes unintended — of policies such as economic development, taxation, education, and transportation. He also serves as a senior fellow at Missouri's Show-Me Institute and a visiting fellow at the Virginia-based Yorktown Foundation for Public Policy.

Explore More

  • Economic Prosperity
  • Criminal Justice and Public Safety
  • Transportation and Infrastructure
  • Education
  • Energy and Environment
  • Community, Growth and Housing
  • Clean, Open and Fair Government

Recent News

Everything is bigger in Texas, except parking mandates

Everything is bigger in Texas, except parking mandates

May 19, 2025
I study local government and Hurricane Helene forced me from my home − here’s how rural towns and counties in North Carolina and beyond cooperate to rebuild

I study local government and Hurricane Helene forced me from my home − here’s how rural towns and counties in North Carolina and beyond cooperate to rebuild

May 13, 2025
Texas HB 24: A win for housing development—and a lesson for other cities

Texas HB 24: A win for housing development—and a lesson for other cities

May 7, 2025
Inclusionary housing: At what price?

Inclusionary housing: At what price?

May 5, 2025
Load More
Facebook Twitter RSS
Better Cities Project

Better Cities Project helps people in America’s largest cities live free, happy lives. We uncover what works, promote solutions, and forge partnerships that turn ideas into results.



© 2023 Better Cities Project

Thanks to QuestionPro for providing us over 35 question types to choose from. The advanced question types help up collect deep insights.

Our Focus Areas

  • Economic Prosperity
  • Criminal Justice and Public Safety
  • Transportation and Infrastructure
  • Education
  • Energy and Environment
  • Community, Growth and Housing
  • Clean, Open and Fair Government

The Fine Print

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Reports and Financials

Recent News

Everything is bigger in Texas, except parking mandates

Everything is bigger in Texas, except parking mandates

May 19, 2025
I study local government and Hurricane Helene forced me from my home − here’s how rural towns and counties in North Carolina and beyond cooperate to rebuild

I study local government and Hurricane Helene forced me from my home − here’s how rural towns and counties in North Carolina and beyond cooperate to rebuild

May 13, 2025
Texas HB 24: A win for housing development—and a lesson for other cities

Texas HB 24: A win for housing development—and a lesson for other cities

May 7, 2025

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

Love Cities? So Do We.

Get ahead of the curve -- learn about innovations, ideas and policies driving change in America's largest cities, with BCP in your inbox.



You have Successfully Subscribed!

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us
  • The Team
  • Work With Better Cities Project
  • Research and Projects
  • Latest Insights
  • Videos

© 2023 Better Cities Project